Linking the supply chain
Software that may help manufacturers and product designers, reduce the costs and CO2 emissions associated with transporting and storing goods is said to have been used for the first time by a major UK retailer on beverage packaging.
The software, created by Incept, based in Redhill, is said to be
‘novel’ in the way it ‘draws a picture of the supply chain’, from when
an item leaves the production line to the shelf, explains Nick Gazzard,
Principal of Incept and Leader of the UK Chartered Institute of
Logistics and Transport’s Sustainable Transport Strategy Group.
‘We draw out factories, distribution depots, warehouses, retailers,
etc. We connect them all up and that provides a generic map in which
you can input any numbers and describe any supply chain for a
particular company or group of products.
‘In the [earlier] stages of the supply chain, you tend to deal with
bulk stock levels and configurations. But as you move downstream, the
configurations begin changing and you move from pallets to roll cages.
The activities that happen at each stage are reflected in the model
[and] each product has its cases of pallet, stock levels and
characteristics reflected accurately.’
Gazzard says the technique responds to an industry need to cut costs.
‘The returns from lightweighting [packaging] are now decreasing and the UK’s Waste Resources & Action Programme
is focusing on the supply chain.
‘Also people are understanding that although average transport
emissions might be five to six per cent, if you look at a specific
product, the emissions might be 20-40%. If industry does not start
measuring this, then the Government will start making them.’
The recent Incept study for a major retailer (whose name remains confidential) tracked the cost and
CO2 emissions associated with the take-home beer supply chain. The
model has found that savings can be made when transporting beer can
multipacks through the supply chain compared to equivalent packs of
glass bottles. For example, £0.049 and 10g of CO2 can be saved when
comparing four-pack 440ml cans versus glass 6x330ml bottles.
The potential savings from switching 50% of take-home beer packs from
glass bottles to cans are estimated at £17,600 and over 3,000t of CO2.
The key aspect is pallet efficiency, explains Gazzard. Cube efficiency
in packing the case converts to a higher pallet loading. ‘The more you
fit [onto the pallet] relative to the amount of litres, it is a lower
cost per litre to transport,’ says Gazzard. ‘The cube can be massively
different depending on the thickness of the glass, the neck, etc. That
can make up to 50% difference in terms of the amount of product
loaded.’ Glass products, due to their geometry, are said to have lower
pallet utilisation, resulting in higher costs per unit.
However, Gazzard notes that the model is not about pitting one pack
type against another. ‘Just because this study found one pack better
than another on one dimension, it does not mean that it is going to be
the case on all dimensions.’
He outlines the importance, moreover, for designers and marketers to
consider pallet optimisation and to work with the logistics industry
and retailers on this. ‘The ideal product to fit a pallet is a
perfectly proportional cube. That is not going to happen, but if you
can morph your product around the pallet on software, you can get a
15-25% improvement in pallet loading by modifying the diameter or the
height of a product to get an extra one in the case.’
He adds, ‘We are trying to give people more levers to pull to reduce
CO2, [and] my view would be that we expand the models to look from raw
material to downstream’.
There are also issues related to vehicle efficiency (ensuring trucks
are largely 90% full), vehicle maintenance, driver behaviour, and so
on.
Vince Major, Chairman at Can Makers, notes, ‘We have been looking at
the front end [manufacturing] and the back end [recycling]. This is a
meeting in the middle’.
Materials World Magazine, 01 Aug 2010
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version

Comments
Linking the supply chain
I was interested to read Rupal Mehta's report on reducing transport CO2 emissions by visually mapping the supply chain and in the use of Incept software for the purpose.
This usefully focuses on the design of the transportational unit e.g. pack contruction, palletisation etc. but there is also an argument to make about routing. Manufacturers often like to use dedicated transport and take the direct route from factory to customer. However, this can often mean under-capacity vehicle loading and empty return journeys. The diametric opposite is a multi-user hub-and-spoke network which tends to operate high vehicle capacity loading in both outbound and inbound directions. In this scenario the distance travelled by each consignment is greater (the trade-off) as the routing is not direct.
Between the two extremes there are many hybrid possibilities such a distribution centres and regional hubs. As Nick Gazzard suggests, the more levers you have to pull the greater the chance of improving the emissions and economic performance. I should say that some players are somewhat emotionally attached to their own fleets and dedicated transport arrangements which affects their willingness to look for such efficiencies.