• Skip to content
  • Skip to nav
  • Become a member
  • Technical communities

Return to IOM3 home

  • Contact IOM3
  • About IOM3
  • Member network
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Current issue
  • News
  • Features
  • Back issues
  • Media Information
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact us
  • Discuss

Craig DurhamCraig DurhamMaterial Matters is the regular Materials World column on topical issues, written (as of the June 2010 issue) by Craig Durham CEng MIMMM. Craig is a Senior Completion Engineer working in the UK upstream oil industry. He is President-elect of the Mining Institute of Scotland and sits on the IOM3 Petroleum and Drilling Engineering Division of the International Mining & Minerals Association.

The column was established by Jack Harris who penned it for many years until he passed away in February 2009.

IOM3 Home › Materials World Magazine

Troubled waters - the BP oil spill disaster

As the new columnist for Materials World I look forward to writing about the many positive aspects of the materials, minerals and mining industries. Sadly the loss of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and unfolding environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico are foremost in my mind this month.

Working in the upstream oil industry, I know how it is possible to lose control of an oil well. I am not going to speculate on the causes in this particular case, but it is clear that a catastrophic sequence of events occurred which normal drilling safeguards and emergency well control equipment failed to prevent.

In time the facts will become clear and we will understand the causes and learn the lessons. In the meantime we have to rely on what we read and hear in the media. I am always astonished at how ill-informed the popular media are about the oil industry, and how emotively most ‘oil’ stories are reported.

British energy company BP was developing the Macondo Prospect oilfield, leasing the rig from Transocean Ltd who are an offshore drilling contractor. The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig (not oil platform) was not ‘moored’ off the coast, it was dynamically positioned using GPS controlled thrusters. At a depth of 5,000ft it is too deep for conventional chains and anchors. The blowout was not caused by ‘a surge’ or ‘sudden spike’ in the reservoir pressure but a loss of hydrostatic head in the well.

Oil is now flowing (not spewing, gushing or pouring) from a length of drillpipe around which the blowout preventor (BOP) has possibly closed, but in this case failed to shear and effect a seal. The leak is not from an oil pipeline, the BOP is not an automatically triggered failsafe valve, and it is not ‘buried below the sea’. It is a series of hydraulically controlled rams located on the wellhead and designed to seal around, and in certain circumstances shear through, the drillpipe or whatever happens to be across the BOP at the time.

You may think I am being pedantic, and I am certainly not trying to make light of the disaster, but many people unfamiliar with the industry would be forgiven for thinking that drilling for oil and producing it from wells are one and the same. However, the differences are significant, not least the near mandatory use of sub-surface safety valves in the latter, which are located below the seabed and automatically failsafe in the event of loss of the wellhead. While it is essential that the industry learns exactly what went wrong and how to prevent it happening again, the public need to understand that with approximately 20% of every barrel of oil being used for everyday materials from tarmac roads, clothing and plastic water pipes to electric insulation, modern life simply cannot function without it.

I am no apologist for the environmental shortcomings of the materials, minerals and mining industries. But if those of us working in these fields do not challenge widespread inaccuracies and champion the facts, who will?

Materials World Magazine, 11 Jun 2010
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version

Comments

23 Jun 2010, 13:41 owa

Deep water mooring

Just a minor comment to above article, for 10+ years rigs are being moored with conventional chain and anchors at depths up to 10.000 ft i.e. water depth was not the reason why this rig was using Dynamic Positioning. Both technologies, DP and conventional mooring have pros and cons but a major disadvantage of a DP system, besides considerable fuel consumption and CO2 pollution, is that it is completely dependent on power supply. Conventional mooring would have kept the rig on location but unfortunately could not have prevented her from sinking.
  • Login or register to post comments
24 Jun 2010, 08:29 AmberD

BP oil spill

Thank you so much for posting this. It is a big help for people who know a little detail about the oil spill and drilling. I am not a professional but I sometimes think that why is it taking so long for BP to accomplish the clean up? Do they have to blame it on the cleaning technology? It’s almost two months since the explosion but we can see very little improvement. I wonder when will it be totally cleansed because the oil if now on it’s way to Pensacola.
  • Login or register to post comments
20 Jul 2011, 06:55 EarlM

As we can reminisce the BP

As we can reminisce the BP oil spill a year ago, it was so dreadful from the fact that many animals from the see have died from the toxic substances of water. And it is such a good news to see the tourists are returning to the Gulf shores. British Petroleum has petitioned the legal court to reduce its damages settlement in this light. But some claim reports of the tourism reversal are inflated or inaccurate. I found this here: Rise in gulf tourism prompts BP to ask for discount
  • Login or register to post comments

Share this item on social networks


  • Home
  • Contact IOM3
  • About/FAQ
  • Venue hire
  • Press room
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Accessibility
  • Terms
  • Login