Code of conduct
Following recent mergers, the IOM3 Council has approved a new Code of Conduct appropriate to all members practising across the breadth of the Institute's range of interests. This Code meets the requirements also of the Institute's Royal Charter, and bodies with which the Institute registers its members.
The Code of Conduct (as detailed below) is available for download here: Code of Conduct (PDF file, 240 Kb)
For more information contact Graham Woodrow, on tel +44 (0)1302 380912 or fax him on +44 (0)1302 380900 or through our online enquiry form.
THE CODE IS PRESENTED IN 4 SECTIONS:
1) The Code for Professional Conduct
2) What is meant by ethical behaviour, and how it applies to the member
3) The Rules for Professional Conduct
4) Guidelines on the interpretation and application of the Rules for Professional Conduct
1) THE CODE FOR PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
To enable members to conduct themselves properly in the performance of
their professional duties, the Institute is obliged to provide a Code
of Professional Conduct to lay down, both for its members and for the
general public, the ethical standards by which its members should
abide. The code will apply to all its members, irrespective of their
grade, the professional role they fulfil and the country in which they
practise. The Code contains, first of all, the specific rules of
conduct to which members must adhere. The rules cover, in plain
language, those basic things that members must do. Where appropriate,
there are Guidance Notes to help members interpret and apply the rules.
The Guidance Notes are not exhaustive and do not cover all
contingences. However, the Guidance Notes do cover the main areas of
professional activity in which members are likely to be involved. An
act which seriously breaches one of the Guidance Notes will probably
breach the Rule for Professional Conduct to which that Guidance Note
applies.
Further, more general guidance is given in the ‘Good Practice Advice’.
This general guidance is to help members by providing more information
on what the Institute considers to be good practice. A member will not
be considered to have breached the Rules for Professional Conduct
solely because he or she has not followed the ‘Good Practice Advice’.
Many, perhaps most, members will pass through their professional lives
without ever having to consider whether their actions are in accordance
with the Code for Professional Conduct. However, the Institute is
anxious that any members who are troubled by an ethical problem,
particularly if they are worried about breaching the Rules for
Professional Conduct, should be able to discuss their concerns with one
or more of the senior members of the Institute. Any member who wishes
to do this should contact the office of the Deputy Chief Executive so
that arrangements can be made.
2) WHAT IS MEANT BY ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE MEMBER
The duty upon members of the Institute to behave ethically is, in effect, the duty to behave honourably; in modern words, ‘to do the right thing’. At its most basic, it means that a member should be truthful and honest in dealings with clients, colleagues, other professionals and anyone else the member comes into contact with in the course of his or her duties. Being a professional and a member of a professional body, such as the Institute, is a badge of probity and good faith and members should do nothing that in any way could diminish the high standing of the profession. This includes any aspect of a member’s personal conduct which could have a negative impact upon the profession.
Members should always be aware of their overriding responsibility to the public good. A member’s obligations to the client can never override this, and members should not enter undertakings which compromise this responsibility. The ‘public good’ encompasses care and respect for the environment, and for humanity’s cultural, historical and archaeological heritage, as well as the primary responsibility members have to protect the health and well being of present and future generations.
3) THE RULES FOR PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
4) GUIDELINES ON THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE RULES FOR PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
Rule 1: All members shall discharge their professional duties with integrity and shall not undertake work that they are not competent to do.
Members must carry out their professional duties with complete objectivity and impartiality, and must always declare and, where possible avoid all conflicts of interest.
Rule 2: All members shall have full regard for the public interest, particularly in relation to matters of health and safety, and in relation to the well-being of future generations.
Members must take all reasonable steps to protect the health and safety of members of the public and of those engaged in the project, both during the construction and the operation and maintenance stages. This will include obeying all legislation relating to health and safety but may extend beyond that to all situations in which there is inadequate statutory provision. Members must not enter into any contracts which compromise this overall responsibility.
Rule 3: All members shall show due regard for the environment and for the sustainable management of natural resources.
No notes on interpretation.
Members are expected to take due account of other relevant good practice advice and any other relevant codes of practice.
Rule 4: All members shall update and broaden their professional knowledge, skills and competence on a continuing basis and shall give all reasonable assistance to further the education, training and continuing professional development of other members and prospective members of the profession.
Rule 5: All members shall notify the Institute if convicted of a criminal offence or upon becoming bankrupt or disqualified as a Company Director.
Risk
All projects or business ventures involve some sort of risk. All projects can go wrong, i.e. ‘fail’; this does not vary with their size. Whether a project can be said to have been a ‘failure’ will depend not only on its performance in simple structural terms. It will be judged according to its lifetime performance in relation to the investment concerned and the negative impact concomitant with every addition to the built environment.
Any member with responsibility for a project, or any part of it, must, by maintaining awareness in his discipline, be aware of the risks and their causes and whose is the responsibility for them. Members should be sufficiently familiar with the underlying procedures, processes and mechanisms to analyse their risks, recommend sensible management measures and give informed, expert judgements on the causes and probabilities of failure, based on the residual risks. This may involve assistance from trained risk analysts, but the member’s responsibility for the judgement is his alone.
No member can be expected to eliminate all risk. But members of the Institute have an ethical responsibility to take all appropriate measures to limit risk, in particular by ensuring that there is adequate risk analysis/assessment and an effective management process during the planning, implementation and post-implementation phases in any project, e.g. through the use of such tools as are designed to evaluate all major risks over the lifetime of a project, including the risk that the net revenue stream may vary significantly from that forecast.
Preventing Disasters
Members need to know of the Royal Academy of Engineering ‘Guidelines for Warnings of Preventable Disasters’. If a situation is developing which is causing a member concern, the member should not hesitate to consult the Institute for guidance if this is needed. Members working in the UK should also be aware of the statutory provisions in the UK* which permit certain disclosures in the public interest and prohibits dismissal in relation to those disclosures.
The responsibility to prevent disasters does not lie simply with those who first become aware that a set of circumstances has arisen which might lead to a disaster. Members who are in senior management positions have a duty to establish procedures so that potentially hazardous situations can be reported to those in a position to take action and ultimately to prevent them becoming actual disasters. They should ensure that all relevant staff are fully versed in these procedures and they should provide that the lines of communication reach not only those who have the responsibility to take corrective action but also those who can understand the implications of the situation.
Small Projects
Unclear terms of engagement in small projects, particularly with small, private or lay clients, can be a common cause of client dissatisfaction, sometimes leading to complaints against members. Members should always make clear at the outset, in simple, layman’s language, what the contract will cover and what it will not cover. Members should take all reasonable steps to satisfy themselves that the client fully understands the service that is to be provided.
* At the time of preparation of this document these are embodied in the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 which is shown in full on the Parliament website. 04/10/07
back to top
